Media competition: a two-sided duopoly with costly differentiation
نویسنده
چکیده
We model a duopoly in which media compete in both the consumer and the advertising markets. The advertisers’ payoffs depend on the coverage in the consumer market, hence there are cross-market externalities but no direct transfers are possible. At a (sunk) cost, platforms select the quality they offer consumers, and the prices they charge consumers and advertisers. Under well-defined conditions, the pure strategy equilibrium of this game is unique and can be computed. Generically, a mixed-strategy equilibrium is shown to always exist and the distributions are completely characterised. Compared to an established benchmark (Shaked and Sutton, (1982)), consumer prices are distorted downward and so is the quality offered to consumers. The introduction of advertising revenue enhances price competition for consumers, and the necessary consumer discount relaxes the need to provide quality. Hence quality (on the consumer side) and advertising revenue are substitutes. Competition is shown to promote the investment in quality, as contrasted to a monopoly. The market may be preempted not as a result of an exogenous contraction, but as a consequence of an expansion, of (advertising) demand.
منابع مشابه
Content vs. Advertising: The Impact of Competition on Media Firm Strategy
M firms compete in two connected markets. They face rivalry for the sale of content to consumers, and at the same time, they compete for advertisers seeking access to the attention of these consumers. We explore the implications of such two-sided competition on the actions and source of profits of media firms. One main conclusion we reach is that media firms may charge higher content prices in ...
متن کاملQuality Disclosure and Competition
We analyze costly quality disclosure with horizontally differentiated products under duopoly and monopoly, and characterize the effect of competition on disclosure and welfare. We show that expected disclosure is higher under monopoly than under duopoly, and the welfare comparison depends on the level of disclosure cost: when the disclosure cost is low, welfare is higher under monopoly than duo...
متن کاملHotelling competition and political differentiation with more than two newspapers
We analyse a newspaper market where media rms compete for advertising as well as for readership. Firms rst choose the political position of their newspaper, then set cover prices and advertising tari¤s. We build on the duopoly work in two-sided markets of Gabszewicz, Laussel, and Sonnac (2001, 2002) who show that advertising nancing can lead to minimum political di¤erentiation. We extend the...
متن کاملTwo-Sided Markets and Price Competition with Multi-homing
We model duopoly competition between two platforms. They operate in a two-sided market where agents are heterogeneous on both sides of the market and are allowed to multihome. Network effects are captured within a vertical differentiation framework. Under single-homing there exists an interior equilibrium where networks exhibit asymmetric sizes and both firms enjoy positive profits. When all ag...
متن کاملNote on ‘Competition in Two-sided Markets’
We extend the models in “Competition in two-sided markets” of Armstrong (2006, Rand Journal of Economics) by adding within-group externalities. In the monopoly and duopoly cases, positive within-group externalities reduce the price of the own group. Negative externalities have an opposite price effect. In the case of a competitive bottleneck, we show by examples that within a certain range of p...
متن کامل